“People who have sleuthed and arrived at unkind opinions have done so on their own. Why? Because they’re pissed. And this blog has given that pissed a place to land.” – Anonymous Commenter
It’s a twisted mess for Beach, as Sue blames her for everything being posted about Salem. Even going so far as to say Beach encouraged all the RadioNewz sleuthers to sleuth Salem.
SSM says she will no longer tolerate Beach’s disrespect!!!
Since when has posting the truth about a situation been considered disrespectful? I mean Holy Shit, Fuck and all that!!!
AND THERE’S MORE TO THIS STORY!!!
I’m told Tricia tried to unban, but it’s been done in such a way she can’t and no one else has been able to either! It is believed to have been done on the server, which SSM wouldn’t have a clue as how to do!!
Basically, Sue has changed the locks on the business and not given Tricia any keys.
More to come on this expected shocker!!!
There has to be an older wiser, grown-up partner(s) at H-Laporte, involved in the acquisition of Ron’s practice, who could intervene, talk sense into Sue, beat back the incompetent Salem, and reach out to Tricia’s attorneys. In spite of Sue’s unreasonable personality — you’d think a stronger effort (by H-Laporte) on behalf of Ron’s widow would be made out of a duty to mitigate damages and help her preserve her estate.
It reads like H-Laporte shoved Sue off on their junior attorneys b/c of the “professional courtesy” no-fee arrangement, and the attorney(s) was just too young and inexperienced to control a high-conflict personality like Sue (and Salem).
Did H-Laporte actually complete the acquisition of Ron’s practice? Or did they call it off during due diligence. Has Sue burnt bridges there?
Are there any kids to watch over newly-widowed Mom and offer her support with her difficult business problems? Would they rather avoid Mom than intervene, in spite of the financial losses she’s risking?
Reports are that Ron was a nice guy. It’s usually the nice guys that end up stuck in co-dependent relationships with the psycho-sue types. They’re willing to enable — cover up and excuse the abuse.
Shame on Salem for stepping in and being Sue’s next enabler.
And shame on Salem for not seeing that when Sue loses this lawsuit, and suffers real financial loses, Sue will not be able to accept the loss, and her own responsibility for her choices that led to the loss.
Nope. It won’t ever be Sue’s fault.
But guess who’s fault it will be?
Yup, that’s right.
Get ready, Salem. You’ve lined yourself up perfectly to be SoSueMe’s next victim. She’ll come after you for incompetent representation, she’ll report you to the Bar, she’ll threaten your livelihood, demand you reimburse her losses, publicly destroy your reputation, and … as you well know … she will never ever ever ever let it go. Ask around. Ask Beach. There’s no other possible outcome but slash and burn — this is the rule of toxic personalities.
Given the fact that you’ve gone and firmly planted yourself directly in range of Sue’s vindictive blame-shooter — you’ve gotta ask yourself one question, Salem.
“Do I feel lucky?”
Ron’s mom’s maiden name is Buford, as is Salem’s maiden name?…Did Salem and Sue just happen to find each other at WS, and Salem jump into helping Sue takeover?
Sue might shoulda considered not filing the suit, or at least not having it play out so publicly. Could be why they seemed to be so freaked about Salem’s name getting out.
Well, the online JD turns out to be fact.
Well, here are the public deets on Salem.
So, all the rumors of no degree, etc… should now be put to rest, ‘eh?!
I’ve seen quite a bit about Tricia’s, but not Sue’s.
So, what is/was it?
I hear she has been very quiet lately. No doubt the thought of losing you is causing a great deal of despair… along with plans for that not to happen.
Is/was she mean, nasty, heavy handed or fair and equal to all? A queen complex?
Fair to all or did she treat you all like …. well, you know. Did she think she owned you or was she very liberal with her moderation decisions and let you play around as you wished?
WALL OF BLAME
Admin/Mods still sporting the Orange HORNS.
(there may be others in signatures…if you notice, feel free to add to list.)
Supporting a friend/owner/management privately is one thing. Supporting a legal position or strategy publicly away from your place of “work/home” is another.
But declaring “sides” at Work/Home, and doing so PUBLICLY by using the Resources and Forum you’re entrusted with in that HOME environment, and attempting to intimidate and influence members and guests — is just all kinds of twisted.
As mods, sporting the Orange Horns (original memorial intent notwithstanding) has clearly become a public show of mod/admin bias in the Websleuths litigation.
This passive aggressive behavior is exactly the opposite of the definition of “Moderator”. It’s excruciatingly poor judgment for those in positions of trust and authority.
So flagrantly biased.
When members and guests see Mods making avatar and signature choices like this — we realize that’s a choice — that there is some serious messaging being delivered with intent. And it’s hardly subliminal.
Your show of support for only one of two owners is part of it. But the stronger message is that which speaks to your character.
The message is that you’re willing to abuse your leadership role, your authority. The message is that you’re happy to flaunt your breach of the implicit trust between moderator and owner(s) in front of members/potential members.
What is communicated through those horns is your disdain, your vengeful heart, your insecurity, your immaturity, your twisted sense of entitlement, and your very public eff-off to the forum, its members and to an owner to whom you have the duty of trust and respect.
You’ve lost our respect, you horny malcontents.
Salem hung tough under rancid things being said about her and said in public.
What good could come of such a thing? She now knows how Websleuths members feel about her moderation style.
Anyway, it ‘s all been said and said right out in public… and she did not respond to any of it.
She did send me a chiding type email to LOL at me trying to draw her out and also that she didn’t need to to defend herself from anything.
She also tried to bully me. LMAO!!
I personally think she should have stated that to you all here in public, but her choice is her business and that’s how she chose to handle it.
I don’t know Salem. You all do and you all had plenty to say.
Somehow, deep down inside I feel she took it well… and even if some of it had her boiling hot mad … she now knows.
Other mods have been mentioned and I’ll get to them later… but soon.
This Websleuths lawsuit has created a huge fucking mess and no one should skate…
And just for some extra fun… at Salem’s expense of course… a commenter and their snark. LOL.
Just dropping by to say hello and to remind you that you have a law degree and better things to do with your time.
Hoping to be proud of you soon…
ADNOID. And perhaps Others…
INSISTING to Sue that Raine is the tip of the WS-members being bilked by Tricia iceburg.
No, Sue. It’s not Tricia’s fault. It’s YOUR fault for entering into a partnership without exchanging personal and business financial statements, without understanding Tricia’s personal indebtedness, Tricia’s education and professional CV, without proof of vetting of existing staff, without customized organizational documents that reflected your understanding of manager’s salary, without consulting skilled corporate attorneys, without consulting accountants.
YOUR FAULT! You failed Due Diligence 101. So what? You made a mistake. Deal with it. Put on your big girl pants, get to work on resolutions, and get the hell over it.
Settle this thing and leave the takeover fantasy behind.
For goodness sakes, you bought into a 40% annual return. That’s nothing to be ashamed or upset about. There’s no crime to solve here.
Sit back, read about real crime cases, hire and fire mods, and enjoy a relatively stress-free retirement.
This misery is all YOUR choice, YOUR doing Sue. If you don’t like being miserable … don’t blame the business partner YOU chose.
Look in the mirror. Start working on you. It’s not to late to learn life’s greatest lesson.
So, if Ursa is such a bitch, who is she? Or they?
One poster thinks Ursa is a single poster from Australia.
I believe Ursa is a powerful consortium of like minded people within Websleuths.
Whoever Ursa is – she/they/it is a wielder of power within the Websleuths community.
Regardless of who or who all Ursa is …. they are are powerful influence.
I know JoJo, not personally, but we’ve had our rounds on this blog in the past and we both come from the Great State of Missouri. I know some peeps who know him. Yes, I get around more than most people think, lol.
Anyway, with Joseph Camp being the current subject of this blog… giving Tricia Griffith and Websleuths a break… what about Joseph Camp? Did he really out Windchime? I don’t know.
But I do know backroom twitter watercooler gossip is that he now may have become interested in the entire Websleuths Lawsuit and especially with the Pruitt’s, since they seem to have the some questionable legal activities in their lives.
This could get interesting. In fact, it could get ugly if JoJo digs into the Pruitt’s.
Joseph A. Camp, an American hero and hacktivist recently exposed Terri Stipp aka Terri Cavitalo as Marcie Wogan. Terri, who is the former moderator of Websleuths has created many hate blogs about Toni Ingram and her supporters which include Jodin Davunt, Sarah Afshar, Joseph Valo, and many others who support the grieving mother who lost her daughter to murder in early December of 2011. Tricia Griffith, the current administrator of the crime forum Websleuths claims she banned Terri Stipp(Windchimes) years ago and they are no longer friends. Check out the conversation here where Terri was busted recently for trying to create even more problems for innocent people using stolen money while making the real Marcie look like a nutcase.
Many have portrayed her as an unwitting victim of two faced deviant enemies of Griffith.
Others have portrayed her as a savvy predator with an attorney husband in demise and looking for a new hobby at his demise.
Anyway you look at it… what happened was savage and immoral.
It really doesn’t matter the reasons behind her personal decision, whether bilked by others or of her own power grabbing greed… the results are what they are. Horrible!
Good people do bad things… and this may be the case here. Of course, it might not be. I don’t know.
Exorcism? It might help.
There are some very deluded people within the ranks of Websleuths that have bought into the narrative and the rumors that Tricia just has too many personal problems to run Websleuths. That is so sad it decries description.
Tricia Griffith has taken Websleuths to the place it is — a nationally recognized real crime board, where many victims and families of victims go to seek help and hope for some measure of justice.
So, what if Tricia has some personal problems, even problems with money management or other sordid things being said about her? Who among any of us could say we are lily white – have no issues or problems?
None of her problems or issues have damaged Websleuths one bit. What they have done is provide ammunition to take advantage of a nice woman in Texas, who no doubt thinks she is doing the right thing, based on exaggerated lies and bullshit she has been fed, non-stop.
What these jokers have done is defame Tricia Griffith beyond imagination and used the trust of a woman in Houston t help get it done. Shameful!
You dare take Tricia Griffith out of the Websleuths picture and what you will get is nothing but a failed true crime forum. One no one wants to participate in. It will mean nothing. Nothing, but an embarrassment to anyone who admits they belong.
Not a single player who is jockeying to take over Websleuths could accomplish anything even close to what Tricia has or will.
Talk about a failure — that happens and you can kiss the good name of Websleuths and it’s national reputation goodbye.
What a tragic ending to so much hard work that would be.
Having said that, I can say my bias is with Tricia.
And having said the above I can say I don’t know Sue.. have no bias against her as a person, don’t dislike her … just don’t like this lawsuit deal she has pulled.
But assuming, and I think we all can, that Sue is a decent and moral person in real life… who got to her online? Who convinced her she needed to do a lawsuit takeover? Who was so angry or fed up with Tricia they wanted her gone?
Who is the joker behind this whole mess? Or were there several? Someone knows. Someone will eventually tell. It’s just a matter of time.
Perhaps we can determine who played what Role during the reign of terror at Websleuths?
alpha female; popularity is based on fear and control; charisma, looks, money, will, force, manipulation; weakens ties between others for the sake of strengthening her own power base
second in command; appears to be the Queen’s twin but has no real power on her own
keeper of the gossip; strategically dispenses tidbits to her advantage; can be as powerful as the Queen but does not publicly seek power
has friends in several groups and can freely move between them; good characteristics (attractive, intelligent, charismatic) but not enough to threaten the Queen; often has good self-esteem
caught between parties in conflicts; rationalizes the Queen’s behavior even knowing it is wrong; values access to the clique’s power more than her own principles
supports the Queen and Sidekick at all costs; desperate to fit in but does not want to be seen as trying too hard; often ends up doing the dirty work for the Queen
victim of the clique; can be outside the group or inside; if inside the group, the status is likely the result of challenging the Queen’s power
Referencing the link this info came from: http://personalitycafe.com/intj-forum-scientists/36879-female-social-behavior.html
Due to some of my staff sleuthers aka “sneaks”… they are hold up in little secret chat rooms, flipping coins, forming little secret gossip societies and among other things – keeping their mouths shut, but with ears wide open.
My answer is simple and it is this… and this picture I used for this blog says it quite plainly.
I am a woman, not a princess. I have an attitude, opinions, and a very loud voice. I am not a liar nor a cheat. I am independent, intelligent, and strong. Just watch me strut my stuff in that Texas courtroom. Ha!
You can read every court document here, thanks to Ursa,
And here is some more of the melting that is dripping on Sue, Kimster and Ed…
I find this whole matter disconcerting in more ways than one. Ed Jaeger and I shared a LONG conversation one evening and he presented a very rational, kind, compassionate and above all else, ethical person. I believed Ed during our conversation…and for a time afterwards.
It was Ed who, in my opinion, took the “ethical and moral indignation” against Tricia and blew it up to be something more than it ever was. Now, to read where Ed gleefully sabotaged Tricia’s own site to annoy and frustrate her is beyond my comprehension. How can someone who purports to be ethical, moral, law abiding, honest, etc. possibly explain or defend his own behaviors?
The entire Sue Pruitt vs. Tricia Griffith meritless lawsuit makes we feel the need to shower…and shower….and shower some more. Will it ever wash away completely?
In addition to Ed, to read Kimster’s 7 page deposition, which, I might add, is very well written but COMPLETELY MERIT-less where this lawsuit is concerned, while keeping in mind that Tricia thought she was a friend…Keep the water running…more showers needed.
I hope the rest of this case is dealt with swiftly and justly. Tricia’s been living under a hailstorm of accusations, threats, betrayals and public humiliation. The whole thing is absolutely ludicrous, heartbreaking and unwarranted.
To Sue Pruitt: I hope you’re satisfied. Although, what did you gain??? $14,000.+ dollars? Was it worth it?
And Ed Jaeger…do you still feel morally superior?
And Kimster, aka. Cynthia…I’m glad you’re not my friend. To trust you would obviously be a serious lapse in anyone’s judgement. BTW: Aren’t you the same individual who sent me a CD of Christian music? Are you truly a Christian? Living a Christ-like life? Is that what a Christian looks like? You, IMHO, provide the strongest argument for Atheism that I have ever encountered. Rest in peace, hypocrite!
Some people are downright scary!! Can you imagine having a guy like Ed, who is now known to be Tricia’s enemy, being your main backroom guy? Knowing all about the forum, how it all works, how to do tricks…. sounds like some dirty tricks at that.
Having access to every member’s personal information. We even have a comment of being a peddler of lies when confronted with one dirty deed against a member. How many more are like this or worse! What does he know about you? What does he know about Tricia and all the mods?
People constantly ask why Tricia puts up with some of the people who have stabbed her in the back… but in the middle of a lawsuit — it’s better to keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
When dirt piles on dirt, it’s hard to dig out.
Almost everywhere you look on Google – there is Tricia Griffith and headlines of the Websleuths Lawsuit… and most importantly other things about Tricia Griffith. Radio star, talk show host, crime fighter, super sleuth, victims advocate, etc..
Tricia Griffith is the face and voice of the most successful real crime forum on the internet.
One article after another, but the one interesting fact is that Sue Pruitt is barely mentioned other than as a party to the lawsuit.
Google logs major players, be they good or bad, but to not be mentioned hardly at all is a major diss.
Interesting how things play out on the internet isn’t it?
D Reply to Response to MSJ (OMEGA) dec 4 2014 FS.PDF
It looks like due to the amount of posting here in the blog…. we need a forum format… and guess what? I just happen to have one.
An SMF forum that was opened in 2010 primarily for the Haleigh Cummings case, but added other cases as well. It hasn’t been active for a long time… but it’s ready to go.
You can register or not… Guests can post…
The url is http://forums.reddios.com/
And the Websleuths Clearing House is right on top.
The same moderation rules apply in the forum as here in the blog. Filty vular comments and threats to harm another person will not be tolerated and will get deleted.
No time outs. No bannings, unless someone makes themselves an issue..
Have fun. Enjoy yourself!!
Everyone knows there is an elephant in the room over at Websleuths and for this blog to ignore it would be careless at best, since so many members have contacted me about this very thing. This is not the kind of post I enjoying making, but it needs to be made.
The burning question on the tip of everyone’s tongue and in their questioning minds is who is lying – Beach or Raine? Was Chico listening in on the calls with Tricia as Beach says or not as Raine says? Beach admitted to listening to 3, while Raine says it was many more. Why all the dancing?
First mention of Calls and first Denial .. http://radionewz.net/2014/11/wheres-the-beef-sosueme/comment-page-1/#comment-68090
2nd Denial + Chico … http://radionewz.net/2014/11/wheres-the-beef-sosueme/comment-page-1/#comment-68110
More denials along the same vein … http://radionewz.net/2014/11/wheres-the-beef-sosueme/comment-page-1/#comment-68139
Raine was invited to blog her story on this blog, but has been consumed with worry over all the hatred she expected to receive.
Also of concern is will Websleuths ever be the power house in the real crime world it once was? Will it return to being a super sleuthing community or will it just be a forum of news links with polite gossip? Are members signing in out of mere habit or are they they there to help solve cases as they once were. It seems to many the sleuthing has ceased.
People are asking these questions and wanting a forum to discuss it and express their opinions. Has SoSueMe damaged a once great crime sleuthing community beyond repair? It’s a fair call.
I believe information is to be shared and read by as may people as possible. I know a lot of the Websleuths members read that blog, but what stuck out to me and I want to drill it in is the sneaky back handed ways SoSueMe has poisoned the minds of said members…. good members, unsuspecting members. All unsuspecting recipients of slanderous suggestion. All that was required by SoSueMe was to coyly “plant the seed”, “say the word” , just saying it in passing and then go on.
Just cook it up and let it simmer in the mind she left it in.
What has happened to Tricia Griffith and Websleuths is reminiscent of the typhoid epidemic that hit America around 1900. It was all spread by one woman. Yes, one woman who infected many others. Mary Mallon was a carrier. She simply spread the disease wherever she went, She became known as Typhoid Mary.
Don’t you think we have a Typhoid Mary in the midst of Websleuths? Don’t you think others have become infected? Some are on the path to recovery, some aren’t.
Please re-read and really take in the exiibits and commentary set forth below.
Don’t skip the emails in Exhibit A, here is just a taste ..
“That’s fine the good news is she has a lawyer and I bet the lawyer knows she isn’t going to be able to afford a long legal battle. Hopefully the lawyer will tell her to settle if not but for the lawyers own interest!”
“I’m going to be working on this like a maniac the next few weeks. God willing, nothing else will come up.
Oh, I also told Ciro he’s going to have to hit her hard during the depo. That is the only thing that will scare her enough to go away. But she has money now. Ciro said she’s already paid for trial time. Where the hell she got it, I don’t know. Did Zoomama die or something? My guess is she finally sold that property in Utah that she and her brother owned out of the trust.
Why, just why does everything seem to work in her favor? I’m damn sick of it.“
“So, while Tricia has rights as a 50% owner, the only thing we can do is keep holding her feet to the fire on our TOS and Rules. She can’t re-write them, nor should she violate them.”
For her disloyalty to WS and its primary owner, who brought her on as admin to begin with.
For actions that materially harmed Websleuths, its reputation, its membership, its members, and crime victims.
For covering up Raine’s actions regarding homicide victim, 13 yo Dylan Redwine. (Forum participants firmly believe Raine (and Salem) inappropriately unapproved posts with views they disagreed with that were within TOS, while Raine also posted with an alternate acct.
(Like it or not, it appears Cathy Rhodes’ attack on Elaine Redwine during the radio show on the very day a few pieces of her son were identified, and Tricia’s appropriate repudiation set into motion Cathy/Raine going to Sue with allegations and Cathy starting a competing forum she used to disparage Tricia and WS there and elsewhere.)
People left or just stopped posting. Websleuths’ reputation became more abt drama, biased moderation, the lawsuit than about crime victims and helping their families.
As an attorney Salem/Carrie was in a unique position to know without a doubt that her actions were unethical and injurious to Tricia, members, and forum overall.
(Side note: Tricia (and others), do not be taken in by Tanya Cox/Tlcox/tlcya/Cetan. As one of those in charge at Docket, she participated in & allowed bashing victim family members and Tricia. As a legal secretary, she posted that Sue had a good case and perpetuated rumors abt Tricia. Both before this drama and recently on the Michael Brown thread as example, tlcya took it upon herself as only a WS member, to moderate the thread. Do not make her a mod. She has had a tendency for years to act as if she’s superior to fellow posters and attempt to control the dialogue. If WS is to heal, a housecleaning should occur, and those who played central roles in attacking Tricia and harming the forum need to be barred from any authority over members.)
Radio, thanks for providing a space for people to address this. This is my opinion based on my and others’ observations.
Response to Motion to Compel
“Ed, we’ve got to come up with the proof for my lawsuit…..It’s up to us to prove everything up. It sucks.”
The worm has turned.
a double-agent or two.
Some real sleuths embedded with the frenemies.
from a baby.
And Tricia, you sly lady.
You True Crime Queen.
Way to trap a Sociopathic Narcissist.
AND school your self-important, resentful volunteer force.
At the same time.
All these years on WS, all these years studying human nature, in all its glorious deviancy — you WERE actually paying attention.
($6K “personal loan with Equity Note”. Ha! That’s not a loan. It’s a Pawn Shop.)
So, Mom, when do you file in Criminal Court?
Oh, and please ask Meagan if she forget “Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress”.
( Because, like, Sue, like, really really hated on you, honey. Like totally on purpose and stuff. )
Regardless, “High Fives” all around. Spank the Mods for me. Then forgive them, for they could not see the Vampire for the romantic fog she danced up around them.
When you win your damages, may there be enough to repay your good friends, recover your losses, upgrade your servers, and have an awesome vacation.
Let me know if you need help screening a few new mods.
(First screening question: “Define Volunteer”.)
Aw heck, I might even start posting again.
Sue: I can only say that I’m sorry there’s no cure.
By 60 years of age, the experts say you’re supposed to have mellowed a bit. If that’s the case, what the heck sort of insane sociopath were you in your 30’s? (Somebody do a background check?) Good grief girl. Get some Prozac, and go to church or something.
Amended MSJ and Exhibits
Amended Counter- Petition.
Newsflash. SoSueTricia is no business person.
Nor is she a social network-savvy angel investor.
An investor performs due diligence (IN ADVANCE) with regard to markets, income sources, financials, tax filing history, staff, possible debts, ownership claims, and risks, negotiates and puts $11K in escrow until terms of deal are met (or not).
A business person protects the integrity of the business she just invested in by NOT sharing partnership strife with non-equity volunteers and members.
Acquiring ongoing businesses typically involve a transitional closing period over time. Sometimes a full quarter, sometimes a year. When there’s problem with closing the deal terms, a business person gets on the phone, or on a plane, conducts a meeting, and seeks to clarify and resolve problems in person.
The LAST thing a business person does is waste time, money, goodwill and human capital dispatching spies and lies and gas lighting an entire force of good-hearted volunteers and then filing a largely frivolous lawsuit.
That’s all just common sense.
The rest of this – below — is just my opinion – FWIW and IANL.
Read Plaintiff’s first pleading. It’s over-reaching and mischaracterizes the agreement. Read Plaintiff’s decision to post the lawsuit on the forum. Again — not a business person’s choice. Read Plaintiff’s “Gambling Questions” Motion to Compel. What would any alleged gambling expenditures have to do with any breach of contract? Nothing. A breach may exist if agreement terms were broken — if Tricia received more than the $3K/mo management compensation agreed to from the business income from WS – if Tricia willfully failed to transfer WS assets in her name into the new WS,LLC in the time allotted – and refused to correct any oversights on a timely basis. A breach may exist if Tricia received compensation in lieu of paying the fixed ongoing expenses of WS — and such “bookkeeping oversight” was not corrected in reasonable time of the error being discovered. There is no breach if Sue never recovers her investment. (There is only bad judgment on Sue’s part.) So far in these pleadings and depos and exhibits, if there have been clear material breaches of the agreement, Sue has not proven this.
So … what could be the objective of this latest Motion — compelling answers to Gambling questions?
Is Sue’s objective to straighten out the Websleuths, LLC financials? To preserve and protect the members, mods, culture and spirit of Websleuths? To recover her $11K “investment”? To push Tricia out with a hostile takeover-like move? Or is it to blame, punish and publicly humiliate Tricia because … two years later, Sue realizes, she speculated poorly, does not understand how to make money on the internet, and, in fact, made a very stupid investment.
From this outside perspective … it feels like the latter.
All these secret alignments, secret threads, secret chats, secret tape recorded calls, secret mutiny of volunteer staff … (c’mon — has no psychopathology been studied on Websleuths?) – it feels so … Toxic personality. Someone is quite masterful at manipulating others. Even groups.
And along with that toxic personality pathology, would go the love of frivolous litigation, (c’mon, $11K invested in a business that has no profitability; who chooses to litigate that?), and the classic inability to take responsibility for one’s own mistakes. But,this investment bungle can’t be Sue’s responsibility — it must be Tricia’s fault. Tricia must be punished. Tricia must suffer for Sue’s mistake, for Sue’s lack of business acumen, for Sue’s ego.
Welcome out of the fog, mods! Mortified? Ashamed? We get it.
But, why waste time & energy blaming each other? Take a breath, take responsibility, and think about who actually duped you, abused your good hearts, and who the real victim here is. Get off the sidelines. Step up and earn your redemption. Disclosing the back-door manipulation Websleuths’ new “partner/owner” undertook to force Tricia out of Websleuths’ ownership is a start.
Hopefully, with a bit more cooperation and a bit less blame-laying those in the know will help bring these false allegations to a quick end, force a settlement, oust the clearly miserable and unhappy “new owner” and let Websleuths be on its way to recovery.
Truthful affidavits and screen shot exhibits can work wonders to accelerate justice. Maybe it all happened for a reason.
And thanks Radio, for the forum.
AnonOnt She needs people to believe someone is after her, not the other way around. It’s how she gets attention and pretty much the only thing that matters to her is getting famous, she doesn’t care how. She’s tried stalking stars like Kelly Clarkson. She tried posing as Peter Facinelli’s mistress and selling her “story to TMZ and almost broke up his marriage with her lies. She tried auditioning for Big Brother Canada and was rejected. She regularly harasses celebrities on Twitter, most recent one I think was Raffi (who the hell harasses Raffi??) and she started a petition to get a Hamilton Spectator writer fired from his job. She wants people to think it’s because of an article he wrote, but she tries every few weeks to get someone else fired from their job, going so far as to call their bosses over and over, file false complaints against them, call the police on them, etc. She’s done this to so many people it’s unreal she’s not in jail. Probably the worst thing about this chick though is that she poses as a victim to get the sympathy of people she then manipulates into harassing her victims further. With this LightUpYellow, it could be a good idea but she started stalking a military wife who found out about her fake GoFundMe campaign and blew the whistle. She told all of the LightUpYellow fans that the military wife was stalking HER and even tweeted out the woman’s physical location on a military base. Before that, she was stalking and harassing a woman with the Amanda Todd Legacy Society. Brianne likes to run to these people and say she’s a victim, but when they see what she’s actually done, she turns on them and tries to ruin their credibility. Enough is enough. We do not stand for cyberbullies making a career out of hurting innocent people.
The gambling thing is rumor as far as I know – a fishing expedition and one likely to be tossed out of court. The buzz all around is that it’s pretty obvious the “motion” (LMAO) was
written crayoned by none other than SoSueMe & Salem… yep, Websleuths’ new legal team! AKA Frick & Frack!
Now, in regards to the stalking that went down on twitter today… not too many rumors about who it must of been. You guessed it – Raine is in first place.
Anyway, once a sassy twitter was put up to confront whoever it was — they went poof and got called a coward, as can be seen below along with some nasty tweets I got sent about the whole mess. What next peeps? What next?